Elon Musk’s recent efforts to overhaul the Social Security Administration (SSA) have sparked significant controversy, testing one of the most politically sensitive programs in America. Musk’s team, part of his initiative called DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency), has reportedly gained access to highly sensitive date from the $1.3 trillion medical records and earnings histories for millions of Americans. Critics fear that this sweeping access could destabilize the program, which served over 72 million Americans; and that Musk’s goal of rooting out fraud could lead to far-reaching, privacy-infringing reforms.
The move has led to a shakeup in SSA leadership. Over the weekend, Michelle King, the acting head of the agency, was replaced by Leland Dudek, a staunch anti-fraud official, fueling concerns about the direction the program is heading. Dudek will oversee the administration temporarily until President Trump’s appointee, Frank Bisignano, is confirmed by the Senate. While the White House insists this leadership change is a necessary step to tackle fraud, critics worry that Musk’s sweeping access to Social Security data could undermine public trust in the program.
Nancy Altman, president of Social Security Works, voiced her concerns, calling Musk’s actions a “fishing expedition.” Altman, who has long advocated for Social Security protections, questioned the need for such extensive data access, pointing out that fraud can be addressed through targeted measures without compromising privacy. “That’s why we have privacy laws,” she emphasized, expressing fear that Musk’s true intentions go beyond fraud prevention and could lead to broader reforms aimed at dismantling the program.
Musk has suggested that Social Security checks are being fraudulently issued, possibly linked to illegal immigration, and even warned that the system could be “the biggest fraud in history.” His remarks echo a broader pattern of seeking access to sensitive government data in his quest to reduce inefficiencies, a move that has attracted legal challenges and raised concerns about the legality of his actions.
The Social Security Administration, long considered the “third rail” of American politics, has been integral to the nation’s social safety net, providing financial support to millions of elderly Americans, as well as those with disabilities. The program’s importance cannot be overstated, with its vast reach making any changes to its structure a politically volatile issue. The term “third rail” was coined decades ago, referencing the high-stakes nature of Social Security, which is critical to the well-being of so many Americans.
Musk’s attack on the SSA came to a head earlier this week when he publicly criticized the program for allegedly issuing checks to individuals who should not qualify. He cited claims of “150-year-olds” still receiving benefits, a comment that has drawn skepticism. Altman dismissed the charge, explaining that a technical issue within the SSA’s COBOL programming system could cause such anomalies. She argued that the claims of fraud were likely exaggerated and not reflective of the actual scope of the problem.
Despite Musk’s efforts to draw attention to the issue of fraud, which he argues could be as large as tens of millions of fraudulent payments, independent audits of the SSA suggest the extent of improper payments is much lower. The SSA’s inspector general reported last year that only about $71.8 billion in improper payments were made from 2015 to 2022, a fraction of the program’s total disbursements, primarily due to overpayments rather than fraudulent claims.
As Musk’s team continues its investigation into the program, concerns remain about the balance between fighting fraud and protecting the privacy and integrity of Social Security. Altman and others fear that Musk’s aggressive approach may be part of a broader effort to undermine the program in the long run. As discussions unfold, the future of Social Security and the role of Musk’s intervention could shape the landscape of American social policy in profound ways.
Investment advisory services offered through Foundations Investment Advisors, LLC (“Foundations”), an SEC registered investment adviser. The views, statements and opinions expressed herein are those of the author, and not necessarily of Foundations or their affiliates. The content provided is for educational purposes only and the views reflected are subject to change at any time without notice. No investment, legal or tax advice is provided. Always consult with a professional. Foundations deems reliable any statistical data or information obtained from third party sources that is included in this article, but in no way guarantees its accuracy or completeness.